At a Glance
On March 9, 2018, Judge Murphy granted our clients’ motion for summary judgment from the bench, dismissing the case. Plaintiffs appealed to the Washington State Court of Appeals, which affirmed the dismissal on February 19, 2020. Their motion for reconsideration of the Court of Appeals decision was denied on April 24, 2020.
- Maria LaHood
- Leah Todd
- Angelo Guisado
Bruce Johnson and Brooke Howlett of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Barbara Harvey, CCR cooperating counsel
Steven Goldberg, CCR cooperating counsel
Joellen Reineck Wilhelm
Davis, et al. v. Cox, et al. was a lawsuit filed against 16 current and former members of the Olympia Food Co-op Board of Directors over their decision to boycott Israeli goods. The boycott was part of the global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel for violations of international law and the denial of Palestinian human rights. The lawsuit was filed in a Washington State court by five co-op members seeking to block the co-op's boycott and to collect monetary damages against the board members, claiming that they acted beyond the scope of their authority and breached their fiduciary duties. The Center for Constitutional Rights and co-counsel Davis Wright Tremaine LLP argued that this action was an illegal Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) and should be dismissed, as it was an attempt to chill the board’s public statements on an issue of public interest. For more on the right to boycott, see our factsheet. This case was part of the Center for Constitutional Rights' efforts to support activists and grassroots organizations facing legal attacks for their advocacy on behalf of Palestinian human rights.
In line with a long history of social justice work, the board of the Olympia Food Co-op, a nonprofit corporation formed in 1976, passed by consensus a boycott of Israeli goods in protest against human rights abuses in Palestine. Subsequently, the co-op held annual board elections, and the five candidates endorsed by Olympia BDS won overwhelmingly. Three of the people who brought the case ran for the board opposing the boycott and lost. Instead of seeking a member vote on the boycott, they filed this lawsuit against board members.