Court Orders NYPD to Film All Citizen Encounters with Body Cameras

Order Calls for Pilot Program to Study Effectiveness of Filming All Encounters

August 10, 2018, New York Late yesterday, a federal court ordered the NYPD to begin using body-worn cameras to film all police-citizen investigative encounters – including low level interactions – as part of a pilot program to study the relative benefits and drawbacks of putting such a policy in place for the entire NYPD. This pilot program is born out of a community-generated reform process, and follows a request by the attorneys behind the three landmark cases that challenged the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk and trespass enforcement practices (Floyd v. City of New York, Ligon v. City of New York, and Davis v. City of New York), as well as a coalition of community stakeholders, who called for a court order requiring the NYPD to implement changes developed by impacted New Yorkers.

“As New Yorkers have continually demanded, the NYPD needs additional accountability tools to prevent future misconduct,” said Angel Harris, Assistant Counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc and counsel for the Davis plaintiffs. “Reforms like this are most effective when they address the concerns and lived experience of communities most affected by the NYPD’s unlawful stop-and-frisk and trespass enforcement practices. That’s why this body-worn camera pilot program is so critical, and we hope the court will continue requiring the NYPD to implement the remaining community-generated reforms.”

The community input process, ordered by the court to address the NYPD’s constitutional violations and known as the Joint Remedial Process, was conducted over the last three years. In May, the court-appointed facilitator overseeing the Joint Remedial Process issued a report on his recommendations based on community input, and the plaintiffs asked the court to order the NYPD to implement his suggested changes. So far, the NYPD continues to oppose the facilitator’s proposed reforms.

Today’s order issued by the court requires the NYPD to use body-worn cameras to film all low-level police-citizen encounters, otherwise known as “Level 1 and 2 investigative encounters”, as part of a pilot program aimed at assessing the effectiveness and feasibility of this change. This reform was shaped by community input and recommended by the court-appointed facilitator of the Joint Remedial Process. After the pilot, the court-appointed monitor will report to the court on whether the program should be expanded or terminated.

“This reform is a step toward transparency that, if done right, will help ensure officers are complying with the law when they use the stop-and-frisk practice,” said Jenn Rolnick Borchetta, Deputy Director of Impact Litigation at The Bronx Defenders.

“To be an effective transparency and accountability tool, body-worn cameras must capture the full range of police-civilian encounters on the streets of New York City,” said Darius Charney, a Senior Staff Attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights and counsel for the Floyd plaintiffs. “We hope that this pilot will be the first step towards reaching that goal.”

This is the second court-ordered reform in response to the community input process, with the first requiring a pilot program to study the usefulness and viability of electronically recording all police-citizen encounters. The facilitator’s other proposed reforms include progressive discipline standards for officers who violate peoples’ rights during stop encounters, a community board and survey to assess the NYPD’s implementation of the court-ordered reforms, and improved information on people with disabilities in stop-and-frisk training. The court has yet to rule on those recommendations.

The Center for Constitutional Rights works with communities under threat to fight for justice and liberation through litigation, advocacy, and strategic communications. Since 1966, the Center for Constitutional Rights has taken on oppressive systems of power, including structural racism, gender oppression, economic inequity, and governmental overreach. Learn more at


Last modified 

August 10, 2018