Contact: [email protected]
LRWC: Gail Davidson, Vancouver, Canada +1 604 738 0338 or [email protected], FIDH: Karine Appy / Fabien Maitre, + 33 1 43 55 25 18, OMCT: Delphine Reculeau, + 41 22 809 49 39, ECCHR: Wolfgang Kaleck, + 493040048590; ALRC: Basil Fernando, [email protected], + 852 2698-6339
Invoking the fundamental principle of the right to an independent and impartial judiciary, Spanish Judge Baltasar Garzón has received strong support from ten international organizations of jurists and human rights advocates. Lawyers Rights Watch Canada, European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, the Asian Legal Resource Centre, Lawyers Without Borders Canada, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the International Federation for Human Rights, the World Organisation Against Torture, the National Lawyers Guild, the International Association of Democratic Lawyers and Asociación Española para el Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos (AEDIDH) have joined in submitting a formal request for action by the United Nations on his behalf. Their request is addressed to U. N. Special Rapporteurs concerned with judicial independence, torture, extra-judicial executions, and the protection of human rights, as well as to Human Rights Council Working Groups on enforced disappearance and arbitrary detention.
The Spanish judicial system has provoked outrage in Spain and internationally by approving criminal charges against Judge Garzón brought by parties opposing the investigation of mass state-sponsored enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killing during the Spanish civil war and under the Franco regime. Judge Garzón has subsequently been temporarily suspended from the bench for attempting to investigate gross human rights violations recognized as crimes under international law.
The actions taken in the Garzón case demonstrate improper interference with the judiciary, in violation of Spain’s obligations to protect an independent judiciary, including in cases of investigating serious international law violations at home. As Judge Garzón is internationally recognized as a leader in the fight to end impunity for mass human rights violations and efforts to strengthen universal jurisdiction, the case against him will likely have a chilling effect on those lawyers and judges willing to pursue accountability at home and abroad.
The human rights organizations call for Judge Garzón to be allowed to pursue his duty to investigate the disappearances of over 100,000 people, without interference by the state and private groups opposing the investigation, and that any disagreements with his decision to investigate be subject to judicial review rather than criminal prosecution. They also call on the Special Rapporteurs and the Working Groups to urge Spain to subject its Amnesty Law of 1977 to judicial review under binding international law. Amnesty laws are generally incompatible with the customary and codified laws and treaties protecting human rights. Amnesty laws allow those responsible for mass human rights violations to hide behind a protective shield, while denying victims’ families the right to know the truth of what happened to their loved ones.
Attachments
The Center for Constitutional Rights works with communities under threat to fight for justice and liberation through litigation, advocacy, and strategic communications. Since 1966, the Center for Constitutional Rights has taken on oppressive systems of power, including structural racism, gender oppression, economic inequity, and governmental overreach. Learn more at ccrjustice.org.
Last modified
May 25, 2010