Jen Nessel, email@example.com
The government’s response to the motion is due to the court on December 20.
“Majid Khan was subjected by U.S. personnel to a ruthless program of state-sanctioned torture,” said CCR Attorney Wells Dixon. “This motion will require the government to state its position for the first time in front of a real court as to whether they think the so-called enhanced interrogation techniques used on Majid are torture under U.S. and international law.” CCR’s reply brief is due January 4, 2008.
Dixon and fellow CCR attorney Gitanjali Gutierrez brought the motions on behalf of their client, Majid Khan, who was taken from Pakistan in 2003, and spent three and half years in secret CIA prisons before “reappearing” at Guantanamo in September 2006.
Both declassified filings are available in heavily redacted form below.
This development comes just over a week after the Supreme Court heard arguments in a landmark case on detainee rights. In the case – aimed at reining in executive power and restoring constitutional rights – CCR attorneys and co-counsel are asking the justices to rule that Guantanamo detainees have a constitutional right to habeas corpus – the right to appear before an independent court to know why they are being held and what the charges are against them.
The Center for Constitutional Rights works with communities under threat to fight for justice and liberation through litigation, advocacy, and strategic communications. Since 1966, the Center for Constitutional Rights has taken on oppressive systems of power, including structural racism, gender oppression, economic inequity, and governmental overreach. Learn more at ccrjustice.org.