Related Cases

What's New

Appeals Court Upholds Olympia Food Co-op's Boycott of Israeli Goods

April 7, 2014, Seattle – Today, the Washington State Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal…

Anti-Boycott Resolution Rejected in Illinois State Senate Committee

April 2, 2014, Chicago – Yesterday afternoon, the Senate Judiciary Committee of the …

Related Resources

The Nation Magazine v. Department of Defense

Print Friendly and PDF

Synopsis

The Nation Magazine v. Department of Defense is a suit that the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) brought against the U.S. government for the press restrictions it enforced during the first Gulf War.

Description

In The Nation Magazine v. Department of Defense, The Nation magazine along with the Center for Constitutional Rights charged the DOD with violating the First and Fifth Amendments in its establishment of press pools during the first Gulf War.

At the onset of the first Gulf War, the DOD implemented press pools to control and monitor the press in Iraq. While those not in the pool were denied access to the war, even members of the press pool were told where and what to report and required by the DOD to travel at all times with an escort.

The Nation magazine argued that the press pools infringed on its right to access and gather news in its effort to serve the American public.

The DOD stated that the purpose of the press pools was to design “a cooperative arrangement designed to balance the media's desire for unilateral coverage with... the responsibility to maintain operational security, protect the safety of the troops, and prevent interference with military operations.”

Though the Southern District Court of New York found that it was qualified to rule on the matter under the separation of powers and that the magazine had standing to sue, Judge Leonard Sand ruled that the issue was moot and he could not rule on the constitutionality of the press pools at that specific time. 

The press pool was lifted in March 1991.