Case Documents

View Attached Documents

Take Action

Ferguson Legal Defense Committee Issues 48-Hour Emergency Call To Action & All-Points Bulletin

"Each generation must, out of relative obscurity, determine its mission, fulfill it, or betray it." …

Related Cases

What's New

Anti-SLAPP Law Protects Free Speech in Olympia Co-op Israel Boycott Case, Attorneys Say

November 21, 2014, Olympia, WA – Today, the Center for Constitutional Rights and co-counsel Davis…

CCR Executive Director Responds to NYPD Killing of Akai Gurley

November 21, 2014, New York – Today, Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) Executive Director Vincent…

Related Resources

Amicus Brief in Glik v. Cunniffe, et al.

Print Friendly and PDF

Synopsis

CCR has submitted an amicus brief in Glik v. Cunniffe before the First Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of Berkeley Copwatch, Communities United against Police Brutality, Justice Committee, Milwaukee Police Accountability Coalition, Nodutdol for Korean Community Development and Portland Copwatch. The brief argues that concerned individuals and Copwatch groups have the right to record public police activity and that that right is clearly protected under the First Amendment. 

Status

CCR filed an amicus brief in support of Glik on January 25, 2011.

In September 2011, the Judge ruled for Glik in the case, saying his First Amendment rights had been violated.

Description

CCR has submitted an amicus brief in Glik v. Cunniffe before the First Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of Berkeley Copwatch, Communities United against Police Brutality, Justice Committee, Milwaukee Police Accountability Coalition, Nodutdol for Korean Community Development and Portland Copwatch. The brief argues that concerned individuals and Copwatch groups have the right to record public police activity and that that right is clearly protected under the First Amendment.

About the case:

On October 1, 2007, Simon Glik held out his cellphone and made an audiovisual recording of three Boston police officers, John Cunniffe, Peter J. Savalis, and Jerome Hall-Brewster, making an arrest on Boston Common. Though Plaintiff held the cellphone in plain view and did not interfere with the arrest, the officers arrested Glik for violating the Massachusetts wiretap statute, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99, as well as aiding the escape of a prisoner and disturbing the peace. The Commonwealth voluntarily dismissed the aiding the escape charge, and the Boston Municipal Court dismissed the remaining two charges by written decision dated February 1, 2008.

Glik then brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the three officers and the City of Boston on February 1, 2010. He is represented by private attorney David Milton and ACLU attorney Sarah Wunsch. The complaint alleges that the individual Defendants violated the First and Fourth Amendments by arresting him for openly recording police officers carrying out their duties in public, and that the City’s policies and customs caused these violations. The complaint also brings state law claims against the individual officers for malicious prosecution and violation of the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act.

 

Timeline

Attached Files