Take Action

Tell Congress: No Military Intervention in Syria!

Posted: 9/5/2013 As Congress prepares to vote early next week on whether or not to take…

What's New

CCR Attorneys Challenging “Targeted Killings” Denounce Proposed Lethal Strike Against U.S. Citizen Abroad

February 28, 2014, New York – In response to news that the Obama Administration is…

CCR Responds to Reports that Obama Administration is Considering Targeting American with Drone Strike

February 11, 2014, New York – In response to news reports that the Obama administration…

Related Resources

Rights Groups Respond to Motion To Dismiss Due Process Challenge To Killings of Three Americans in U.S. Drone Strikes

Print Friendly and PDF


December 14, 2012, New York – Today, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) issued the following statement in response to U.S. officials’ motion to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the targeted killing of three U.S. citizens, including a 16-year-old boy, in Yemen last year:

The essence of the government’s argument is that it has the authority to kill Americans not only in secret, but also without ever having to justify its actions under the Constitution in any courtroom. To claim, as the administration has today, that the courts have no role at all to play in assessing whether the government's targeted killings of Americans are lawful—even after the fact—simply cannot be squared with the Due Process Clause.
The president himself has acknowledged that the targeted killing program must be subject to more meaningful checks, but there is little evidence of that recognition in the brief filed by the government today. If the court accepts the government's position, it is not only the current president but every future president who will wield the power to kill any American he or she deems to present a threat to national security, without ever having to explain that action to a judge. The Constitution requires more.
The case, Al-Aulaqi v. Panetta, was filed on behalf of Nasser Al-Aulaqi, the father and grandfather of Anwar and Abdulrahman Al-Aulaqi, and Sarah Khan, the mother of Samir Khan. It names as defendants Defense Secretary Leon Panetta; former CIA Director David Petraeus; Adm. William H. McRaven, Commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command; and Gen. Joseph Votel, Commander of the Joint Special Operations Command.
Attorneys on the case include Jameel Jaffer, Hina Shamsi and Brett Kaufman of the ACLU, and Pardiss Kebriaei, Maria LaHood and Susan Hu of Center for Constitutional Rights.  
To read a copy of brief, visit the CCR case page or the ACLU case page.  

The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.